IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE CASE NO. 1:24-cv-00937-PAB COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA., as assignee and subrogee of Parkdale, Incorporated and U.S. Cotton, LLC, JUDGE PAMELA A. BARKER

Plaintiff, Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg -vs-

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REBECCA BRADSHAW, OMAR NEGRON and ANGEL DAVID ROSEN d/b/a AFFORDABLE PALLET,

Defendants.

This matter is before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg (Doc. No. 76), which recommends that the Court grant Plaintiff’s Motion for Disbursement/Distribution of Garnished Funds (Doc. No. 72). No objections have been filed. For the reasons that follow, the Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED. STANDARD OF REVIEW When objections are made to a Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, the district court reviews the case de novo. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b)(3) provides in pertinent part: The district judge must determine de novo any part of the magistrate judge’s disposition that has been properly objected to. The district judge may accept, reject, or modify the recommended disposition; receive further evidence; or return the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions.

As stated in the Advisory Committee Notes, “[w]hen no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.” In Thomas v. Arn,

(1985), the Court held, “[i]t does not appear that Congress intended to require district court review of a magistrate’s factual or legal conclusions, under a de novo or any other standard, when neither party objects to those findings.” DECISION This Court, having reviewed the Report and Recommendation and finding no clear error, accepts the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff’s Motion for Disbursement/Distribution of Garnished Funds (Doc. No. 72) is GRANTED.1 The Clerk is hereby

authorized and directed to disburse the $1,730.12 deposited with the Court by Garnishee, US Bank (see Doc. No. 53) to: National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa. (EIN No. 25-0687550) c/o Matthew A. Lipman, Esquire McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLP 1617 JFK Blvd., Suite 1500 Philadelphia, PA 19103

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Pamela A. Barker PAMELA A. BARKER Date: September 8, 2025 U. S. DISTRICT JUDGE

1 Upon consultation with the Court Finance Department pursuant to Local Rule 67.2, the Court declines to adopt the specific Proposed Order of Disbursement attached to Plaintiff’s Motion (Doc. No. 72-1) and instead orders the disbursement as set forth herein. 2