DONTE GIBSON v. MARK ZUCKERBERG, et al.
DONTE GIBSON v. MARK ZUCKERBERG, et al.
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
DONTE GIBSON, : : Plaintiff, : Case No. 1:25-cv-290 : vs. : Judge Jeffery P. Hopkins : MARK ZUCKERBERG, et al., Chief Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. : Bowman : Defendants. :
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 6) issued by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on July 28, 2025. The Magistrate Judge recommends that Mr. Zuckerberg’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 3) be granted and this action be dismissed with prejudice.1 No objections have been filed and the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired. Having carefully reviewed the comprehensive findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge and finding no clear error, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 (advisory committee notes from 1983 amendment) (“When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation”); see, e.g.,
1 The second defendant, Paul Greene, was never served. See Doc. 6, PageID 90 n.1. Were claims against Mr. Greene to be dismissed on that basis, his dismissal would be without prejudice. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). However, the Magistrate Judge’s conclusion that Plaintiff “fails to state any viable claim under federal law” applies to his claims against both defendants. See Doc. 6, PageID 92–93. And pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B), this action may be dismissed at any time on account of its failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted, including prior to service. Accordingly, the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation that the entire action be dismissed with prejudice is sound. Roane v. Warden of Corr. Reception Ctr., No. 2:22-cv-2768,
2022 WL 16535903, at *1 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 28, 2022). Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Mr. Zuckerberg’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 3) and DISMISSES this action with prejudice. The clerk is directed to TERMINATE this case from the Court’s docket. IT IS SO ORDERED. October 7, 2025 Biagpag. Alena Hon. Jétfefy P. Hopkins United States District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown