Allan Thompson v. Warden Leunike, et al.
Allan Thompson v. Warden Leunike, et al.
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
ALLAN THOMPSON, : : Plaintiff, : Case No. 1:23-cv-642 : vs. : Judge Jeffery P. Hopkins : WARDEN LEUNIKE, et al., : : Defendants. :
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 26) issued by Chief Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on August 5, 2025. The Magistrate Judge recommends that Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 23) be granted. No objections have been filed and the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired. Having carefully reviewed the comprehensive findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge and finding no clear error, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 (advisory committee notes from 1983 amendment) (“When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation”); see e.g., Roane v. Warden of Corr. Reception Ctr., No. 2:22-cv-2768,
2022 WL 16535903, at *1 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 28, 2022). Accordingly, Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 23) is GRANTED. The Clerk is ORDERED to terminate this case on the docket. IT IS SO ORDERED. December 10, 2025 fferYY. H@pkins United States District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown