District Court, S.D. Ohio, 2026

Tyana Chandler v. Princeton City School District, et al.

Tyana Chandler v. Princeton City School District, et al.
District Court, S.D. Ohio · Decided January 30, 2026
Tyana Chandler v. Princeton City School District, et al.

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION TYANA CHANDLER, : : Plaintiff, : Case No. 1:25-cv-00231 : vs. : Judge Jeffery P. Hopkins : PRINCETON CITY SCHOOL : DISTRICT, et al., : : Defendants.

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 28) issued by Chief Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on January 15, 2026. The Magistrate Judge recommends that Plaintiff’s Complaint be dismissed for lack of prosecution. No objections have been filed and the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired.

Having carefully reviewed the comprehensive findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge and finding no clear error, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 (advisory committee notes from 1983 amendment) (“When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation”); see e.g., Roane v. Warden of Corr. Reception Ctr., No. 2:22-cv-2768, 2022 WL 16535903, at *1 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 28, 2022). Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES Plaintiff’s Complaint for lack of prosecution and all pending motions (Docs. 6, 7, 10, 15, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23) are DENIED as MOOT. Accordingly, the Clerk is directed to terminate the case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

January 30, 2026 fe kins United States District Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.