Augustina Ramos v. Commissioner of Social Security

PEARSON, J.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

AUGUSTINA RAMOS, ) ) CASE NO. 1:25-CV-1015 Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) JUDGE BENITA Y. PEARSON ) COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL ) SECURITY, ) MEMORANDUM OF ) OPINION AND ORDER Defendant. ) [Resolving ECF No. 11]

On November 24 2025, the assigned magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation that the Commissioner of Social Security's final decision denying supplemental security income be affirmed See ECF No. 11.

The Federal Magistrates Act requires a district court to conduct a de novo review only of those portions of a Report and Recommendation to which the parties have made an objection.

See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). Parties must file any objections to a Report and Recommendation within fourteen days of service. See id.; Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). Failure to object within this time waives a party’s right to appeal the district court’s judgment. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 145 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 949–50 (6th Cir. 1981). Absent objections, a district court may adopt a magistrate judge’s report without review. See Thomas, 474 U.S. at 149.

Objections to the Report and Recommendation were due by December 8, 2025. None have been filed. Accordingly, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation. ECF No. 11.

The Commissioner’s decision denying Plaintiff 's application for supplemental security income is affirmed. A separate Entry of Judgment shall issue.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

February 13, 2026 /s/ Benita Y. Pearson Date Benita Y. Pearson United States District Judge