District Court, S.D. Ohio, 2026

Dustin M. Kinnett v. State of Ohio et al.

Dustin M. Kinnett v. State of Ohio et al.
District Court, S.D. Ohio · Decided February 17, 2026
Dustin M. Kinnett v. State of Ohio et al.

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON DUSTIN M. KINNETT, : : Plaintiff, : : Case No. 3:25-cv-208 v. : : Judge Thomas M. Rose STATE OF OHIO et al., : : Magistrate Judge Caroline H. Gentry Defendants. : : ______________________________________________________________________________ ENTRY AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION DUE TO PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE JANUARY 12, 2026 ORDER ______________________________________________________________________________ On June 6, 2025, Plaintiff Dustin Kinnett (“Kinnett”) filed a Complaint. (Doc. No. 1.)

On December 23, 2025, Magistrate Judge Caroline Gentry issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) (Doc. No. 30), recommending that the undersigned deny Kinnett’s Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis and order him to pay the filing fee. (Doc. No. 30 at PageID 248.) Finding Magistrate Judge Gentry’s R&R well-founded and noting no objections were filed thereto, the Court adopted the R&R and ordered Kinnett to pay the filing fee: It is therefore ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 29) is DENIED; 2. Plaintiff shall pay the $405.00 filing fee within 30 days of this Entry and Order; and 3. Plaintiff is placed on NOTICE that if he fails to timely pay the full filing fee, his case may be dismissed for failure to prosecute. See FED. R. CIV. P. 41(b); see also Link v. Wabash R.R., 370 U.S. 626, 630–31 (1962). (Doc. No. 31 at PageID 250–51.)

More than thirty days have now passed since the Court issued the Entry and Order, and Kinnett has not paid the $405 filing fee. Therefore, Kinnett failed to comply with the Court’s Order. Thus, in accordance with the above admonishment, the Court dismisses this case for want of prosecution.

Accordingly, the Court ORDERS that this case is DISMISSED for want of prosecution due to Kinnett’s failure to comply with the January 12, 2026 Entry and Order. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to terminate this case on the Court’s docket and serve Kinnett with a copy of this Order.

DONE and ORDERED in Dayton, Ohio, this Tuesday, February 17, 2026. s/Thomas M. Rose ________________________________ THOMAS M. ROSE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.