Smoot Construction of Washington, D.C. v. The Smoot Corporation, et al.
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
SMOOT CONSTRUCTION OF WASHINGTON, D.C., Plaintiff, Civil Action 2:22-cv-1707 v. Judge Michael H. Watson Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura THE SMOOT CORPORATION, et al., Defendants.
ORDER This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion for Leave for the Parties to File Documents Under Seal (ECF No. 149). Therein, Defendants seek an order for Plaintiff to file certain exhibits to Plaintiff’s Memorandum in Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Declaration in Support of Cross-Motion to Enforce Instanter Due to New Evidence (ECF No. 145) under seal, asserting that those exhibits contain Defendants’ contain confidential financial information and profit margins regarding Defendants’ operations that could be used by competitors. (Id.) Based on these representations, the undersigned concludes that the exhibits contain sensitive and confidential information that should be shielded from public access. Accordingly, Defendants’ Motion (ECF No. 149) is GRANTED. Plaintiff is ORDERED to file Exhibits I and J to their Memorandum in Opposition, comprising the 2014 and 2015 Consolidated Financial Reports of Defendant Smoot Corporation, UNDER SEAL. However, the Court is mindful that sealing of documents should be narrowly tailored and no broader than necessary. See Shane Grp., Inc. v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan, 825 F.3d 299, 305 (6th Cir. 2016).
Accordingly, Defendants shall also, WITHIN SEVEN DAYS of the date of this Order, file redacted versions of the exhibits on the public docket, redacting only that information constituting Defendants’ confidential financial information as described in Defendants’ Motion.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Chelsey M. Vascura CHELSEY M. VASCURA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.