Hamilton Circuit Court, 1895

Flynn v. Flynn

Flynn v. Flynn
Hamilton Circuit Court · Decided December 15, 1895 · Smith
6 Ohio Cir. Dec. 4

Counsel

L. H. Pummill, for plaintiff in error., Shay, Jackson &Cogan, contra.

Flynn v. Flynn

Opinion of the Court

Smith, J.

We are of the opinion that the order made by the court of common pleas allowing alimony pendente lite to Mrs- Flynn was clearly and manifestly against the weight of evidence, and should be reversed and set aside. On the case made on the petition and the evidence offered, it seems to us that she, herself, was wholly and entirely in the wrong, and the husband in the right, and taking all the circumstances into account, the kindness with which she was treated by him, the amount of money and property which she received from him, and which she wrongfully and improperly appropriated to her own use when without any just cause or provocation she deserted him, that she has no claim whatever against him or his estate for any alimony pendente lite or otherwise.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.