Hamilton Circuit Court, 1897

Blymyer v. Meader

Blymyer v. Meader
Hamilton Circuit Court · Decided July 1, 1897 · Cox, Smith, Snfith, Swing
9 Ohio Cir. Dec. 173

Counsel

Wilby & Wald, for the motion., Paxton, Warrington & Boutet, contra.

Blymyer v. Meader

Opinion of the Court

Smith, J.

The question presented in this case is identical with that passed upon in Thompson, admx. v. Building Co., 7 Ohio Circ. Dec., 68; but different counsel appearing in this case, and the question presented being an important one, we have heard and considered it again. We are of the opinion, however, that the doctrine announced in the case referred to was correct, and the motion to dismiss the appeal in this case will be sustained.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.