Hamilton Circuit Court, 1899

Blank v. Altenau

Blank v. Altenau
Hamilton Circuit Court · Decided January 15, 1899
10 Ohio Cir. Dec. 536

Counsel

Louis J. Dolle, for plaintiff in error., Filarles P. Droste, contra.

Blank v. Altenau

Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

The plaintiff below sued on a judgment against Sarah Brown, obtained during the January term, 1897, upon which there is an unsatisfied balance of $296.31. He claimed that this judgment became a lien on property on Price Hill, sold and transferred during that term of court to the present plaintiff in error. The court below sustained a demurrer to the purchaser’s answer, and granted a decree for sale.

The reviewing court holds that Sarah Brown lost her right of homestead by the transfer; that the judgment is a lien on the property in question ; but the purchaser having paid back-taxes and an old mortgage, is subrogated to those claims.

Judgment reversed, demurrer overruled and cause remanded for further proceedings.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.