Hamilton Circuit Court, 1899

In re Hayman

Hamilton Circuit Court · Decided July 1, 1899 · Swing

10 Ohio Cir. Dec. 815

Counsel

Campbell, Bates, Cien Dening & Meyer, for Hayman., Thomas H. Darby, for the state.

Opinion of the Court

SWING, J.

We are of the opinion that the judgment in this case should be reversed, on the ground that it is not sustained by sufficient evidence. The evidence in a case of this kind should be clear and satisfactory, that the party was guilty of the offense charged. And it seems to us that it comes very far short of being such.

Judgment reversed and remanded.

For decision of the count of common pleas, as to act justifying removal, see 5 Dec., 550.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.