Hamilton Circuit Court, 1902

Martin v. Gunnison

Martin v. Gunnison
Hamilton Circuit Court · Decided July 1, 1902 · Jelke, Swing
14 Ohio C.C. Dec. 679

Counsel

Joseph Cox, Jr., for A. Gunnison, cited:, Horstman & Horstman, for Mabel H. Martin, cited:

Martin v. Gunnison

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We are of opinion that the plaintiff in error having faded to give bond within the prescribed time in accordance with the order of the common pleas, the attached property was never brought into this court and that this court has no jurisdiction of the same, and, hence, can make no order of any kind in regard to the same or pass upon the motion of the defendant in error. If any further entries or orders of court are necessary they must be sought in the court of common pleas.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.