Humphreys v. State
Opinion of the Court
We think the judgment of the court of common pleas should be affirmed.
The court did not err in refusing to dismiss the appeal from the probate court.
The provision in Sec. 6408 Rev. Stat., which requires a written notice to be given, does not apply to the state of Ohio. We find no provision of the statute which does, in terms, apply to the state taking an appeal, therefore, under Sec. 6411 Rev. Stat., Sec. 5227 Rev. Stat. is the section which governs, and under it a notice entered on the records is a proper notice of appeal.
The bequests are to institutions organized for purely public charities, but in our opinion are not to institutions in the state of Ohio. They are all incorporated under the laws of other states, and while controlled exclusively by the Presbyterian church, which church has a very large membership in the state of Ohio, this is not sufficient to make these institutions Ohio institutions within the meaning of this act. The object of the act, we think, was to limit the exemptions to purely Ohio institutions, and this cannot be claimed of any of these institutions. The state must be presumed to have a care for only its own people and its own institutions. While most of these institutions dispense public charity in Ohio, not all of them do. For instance, the Board of Steed-man’s Missions is a corporation under the laws of Pennsylvania, and its charitable work is among the freedmen of the south, so that the only way that this can be considered an Ohio institution is from the fact that
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.