Hamilton Circuit Court, 1903

Fleurot v. Fletcher

Fleurot v. Fletcher
Hamilton Circuit Court · Decided March 2, 1903 · Giffen, Jelke, Swing
18 Ohio C.C. Dec. 841

Counsel

Drausin Wulsin and B. B. Dale, for plaintiff., Maxwell & Ramsey, for defendants:

Fleurot v. Fletcher

Opinion of the Court

SWING, J.

The petition in this case alleged that plaintiff loaned defendants $15,000 for a term of three years, receiving as security a deed in fee ■simple to certain real estate, and giving a lease back to the defendants; that the said loan had not been repaid, and that the deed was in fact a mortgage; and praying for a foreclosure and sale of the said property.

The motion to dismiss the appeal in this case should be overruled. Plaintiff’s cause of action is purely equitable. No right to a jury existed. The right to have the deed declared a mortgage and the right to have the transaction declared a loan for $15,000 was wholly within the jurisdiction of a court of equity, and could not be tried to a jury. Whether or not a case is appealable depends upon the relief sought, and here it is equitable.

Jelke and Giffen, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.