Hamilton Circuit Court, 1908

Enderes v. State

Enderes v. State
Hamilton Circuit Court · Decided November 14, 1908 · Giffen, Smith, Swing
11 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 473; 1908 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 243

Counsel

M. G. Lyhins, for plaintiff in error., John M. Thomas, for the state.

Enderes v. State

Opinion of the Court

It is not charged .in the affidavit that the offense ivas committed at the city of Cincinnati and county of Hamilton, but “within four miles of the corporate limits of the city and county aforesaid. ” Under this averment it may have been in the state of Kentucky. It is admitted in the record that Coney Island is within four miles of the city of Cincinnati, but there is no proof that it is within the county of Hamilton and state of Ohio.

Judgment reversed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.