Hamilton Circuit Court, 1908

Stearns v. Hibben Dry Goods Co.

Stearns v. Hibben Dry Goods Co.
Hamilton Circuit Court · Decided December 19, 1908 · Giefen, Smith, Swing
11 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 553; 1908 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 252

Counsel

Peck, Shaffer & Peck, for plaintiff in error., Walter A. DeCanvp, contra. , Peck, Shaffer & Peck argued in the circuit court for the plaintiff in error, Mr. Walter A. DeCamp argued for .the defendant in error,

Stearns v. Hibben Dry Goods Co.

Opinion of the Court

The ruling -of the Superior Court in General Term upon a demurrer should, when the case is transferred to this court, be followed unless clearly erroneous.

The petition discloses no misrepresentation by the board of directors upon which the pl-aintiff relied to his prejudice, nor the concealment by them of any fact not recorded in the minutes, which, -on demand, were open to inspection by the plaintiff as a stockholder. - '

Whatever be the nature of the trust created by the resolution of the board of directors -on January 10th, 1898, it terminated on or before June 30th, 1899, more than six years before the commencement of the action.

Although a demand was necessary before beginning the action, the failure to make demand did not suspend the operation of the statute of limitations. Hawk v. Minnick, 19 O. S., 462; Douglass v. Corry, 46 O. S., 349; Townsend v. Eichelberger, 51 O. S., 213.

Judgment affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.