Hamilton Circuit Court, 1909

Loeb v. Kent

Loeb v. Kent
Hamilton Circuit Court · Decided June 15, 1909 · Giffen, Smith, Swing
12 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 352

Counsel

Bates & Meyer, for plaintiff in error., Klein & Stagman and James R. Jordan, contra.

Loeb v. Kent

Opinion of the Court

No transcript of the final record or transcript of the docket or journal entries in this case was filed in this court until long after the four months from the rendition of the judgment complained of, and not for more than four months after the petition in error had been filed. This court therefore has acquired no jurisdiction to hear and determine whether the judgment is correct or not. 58 O. S., 221; 66 O. S., 356.

The action in this court should- he dismissed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.