Hamilton Circuit Court, 1909

Hellman v. Pogue

Hellman v. Pogue
Hamilton Circuit Court · Decided June 15, 1909 · Giffen, Smith, Swing
13 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 368

Counsel

J. M. Dawson, for plaintiff;., C. B. Matthews and Pogue & Pogue, contra.

Hellman v. Pogue

Opinion of the Court

A sale of pledged chattels by the pledgee upon notice given only to such persons as he deems liable to be interested in the property and at his private office is not a public sale; and, in the absence of express agreement, if the property be bid off by bim the contract of pledge is not thereby terminated, nor the relations of the parties changed. Bank v. Richardson, 156 Mo., 281; Glidden v. Bank, 53 O. S., 588.

A certificate by the pledgor of such sale subsequent' to' the payment by a surety of two of the judgments secured by the .pledge does not defeat the right of the surety to be subrogated to the fights of the judgment creditor or pledgee in the property pledged. Sec. 5386, R. S.; Hill v. King, Executor, 48 O. S., 75.

Decree for plaintiff.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.