Hamilton Circuit Court, 1910

Williams v. Crockett

Hamilton Circuit Court · Decided July 9, 1910 · Gillen, Qiffen, Smith, Swing

23 Ohio C.C. Dec. 396; 14 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 347; 1910 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 326

Counsel

Burch & Johnson, for plaintiff in error., Chas. A. J. Walker, for defendant in error.

Opinion of the Court

QIFFEN, P. J.

The plaintiff in error not only denied the existence of any special contract with the defendant in error, bnt made such denial in uniting before suit was commenced.

The defendant in error thereupon elected to sue as upon an implied quantum meruit for the value of the services rendered, and recovered a verdict. The judgment should be affirmed. Ralston v. Kohl, 30 Ohio St. 92.

Smith and Swing, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.