Hamilton County Probate Court, 1889

In re the Assignment of Ebert

In re the Assignment of Ebert
Hamilton County Probate Court · Decided July 18, 1889 · Goebel
1 Goebel 231

Counsel

Tapie, Moos & McCabe, for creditors., Ferd. Vogeler, for Mrs. Ebert.

In re the Assignment of Ebert

Opinion of the Court

Goebel, J.

Whether Ebert was the agent, or had power to delegate such authority to Reinhardt, it is not necessary to determine. Ebert did not act upon such authority, and Reinhardt did not assume to act upon Ebert’s authority. Reinhardt not being the agent or attorney of Mrs. Ebert, had no authority to make the affidavit to the chattel mortgage. The chattel mortgage to Mrs. Ebert not having been sworn to by the mortgagee, her agent or attorney, as provided by section 4154 R. S., the same is void as against the creditors of the mortgagor. Hanes v. Tiffany, 25 O. S. 549; Blandy v. Benedict, 42 O. S. 295.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.