Knox County Circuit Court, 1906

Howard v. E. T. Kinney Co.

Howard v. E. T. Kinney Co.
Knox County Circuit Court · Decided October 12, 1906
19 Ohio C.C. Dec. 186; 8 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 568; 1906 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 228

Counsel

Hugh Neal and L. B. Houck, for plaintiff in error., F. V. Owen, for defendant in error.

Howard v. E. T. Kinney Co.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

In this case the petition shows that judgment was rendered against the plaintiff in the common pleas court of Fulton county on a cognovit note. The allegation that he did not have opportunity to appear and make a defense is not important, because the averment that it was rendered on a cognovit, implies.that his appearance was there entered under the terms of that cognovit, and that being true he was in court to all intents and purposes, and if he has a defense to that action, that is the court in which he must make application for relief. It is only where a judgment is void for want of jurisdiction that an injunction will lie to restrain a levy of an execution issued upon that judgment.. Finding and decree for defendant; petition of plaintiff dismissed at the costs of plaintiff. Remanded for execution. Motion for new trial overruled and exceptions noted.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.