Licking Circuit Court, 1905

Holtsberry v. Bounds

Holtsberry v. Bounds
Licking Circuit Court · Decided March 15, 1905 · Donahue, McCarty, Taggart
9 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 510

Counsel

J. H. Jones, for plaintiff., Kibler & Kibler and Hunter & Hunter, for defendants.

Holtsberry v. Bounds

Dissenting Opinion

Taggart, J.,

dissenting.

I desire to enter a dissent to the judgment and opinion of the courts in this case, believing as I do that the testimony shows that the use of this way by the plaintiff, and those through whom he claims title, was simply permissive, and not adverse, nor under a claim of right; and therefore the judgment of the court is not warranted by the facts or by the law of the ease.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.