State v. Norris
Opinion of the Court
(orally).
A question was raised in this case under Section 12381, that the prosecution of the defendant was barred by the statute of limitations — under the three-year provision of the statute. To
“A person shall not be indicted or criminally prosecuted for a misdeameanor, the prosecution of which is not specially limited by law, unless such indictment is found, or prosecution commenced, within three years from the time such misdemeanor was committed.” ■
This indictment was not found within three years from the time the offense was committed, but the defendant was arrested and taken before some officer — either a justice of the peace or the mayor — and was bound over to this court before the expiration of the three years. The question is whether that is a prosecution which saves it from being barred by the statute of limitations.
Suppose that the prosecuting witness had not learned who the person was who committed the offense until just shortly before the three years had expired; that he knew that there was an offense committed, but did not know who committed it; and just before the three years had expired, he should ascertain who committed it and had arrested him under an affidavit filed before the mayor or the justice of the peace, and he was taken before that officer and had a trial, or hearing, and was bound over to the common pleas court; the common pleas court or the grand jury did not meet until after the three-year term had expired, would that be barred by this section of the statute?
The court thinks that the preliminary hearing is a prosecution that would save it from being barred by the statute of limitations. A motion to quash may be considered as filed, and it will be overruled with exceptions.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.