Stark County Court of Common Pleas, 1818

Stout v. Lisinger

Stout v. Lisinger
Stark County Court of Common Pleas · Decided March 15, 1818 · Associates, Coulter, Henry, Hoover, Tapp
1 Tapp. Rep. 241

Counsel

After the, jury were impannelled and sworn, Harris, for the defendant, moved for leave to plead., Goodenow for the plaintiff.

Stout v. Lisinger

Opinion of the Court

President.

Filing a declaration in tbe original suit was a waiver

of bail, and might have been placed in bar of tbis action; so the discharge of the principal, when taken on a ca sa issued on the judgment obtained in the suit to compel an appearance, in which this bond was .taken, is a discharge of the demand secured by it. It is evident, therefore, that the plaintiff ought not to recover, and could not recover, had not the defendant neglected making any defence, and by his default left tbe question to be how much, and not whether any, damages. The verdict ought to be for mere nominal damages. Verdict for 6 cents.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.