M. D. Potter & Co. v. Steamboat Monarch
Opinion of the Court
The first section of the watercraft law provides, “that steamboats and other watercrafts, navigating the waters within or bordering upon this State, shall be liable for debts contracted on account thereof by the master,
Further, it has been held by Judge Storer that a contract made with the captain of a boat to recompense parties who had saved property, fell within the equity of this statute. In view of these various decisions, I do not conceive that it would be straining the law to hold that all the items of the account, excepting the publication in the newspaper, were supplies within the meaning of the statute. It is not for the party furnishing these bills or cards, furnished on the boat for her use, in connection with her navigation, to inquire whether they were to perform their service strictly on the boat or elsewhere. Judgment for the amount of all the items, except the advertising account.
This judgment was subsequently affirmed in general term and in the supreme -court.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.