Keuhter v. Temmen
Keuhter v. Temmen
8 Ohio N.P. 21
Opinion of the Court
Werner, ’by his garnishment in the common pleas-, acquired an interest, by way of assign- • ment, in whatever moneys, credits or choses I in action might be due from the Temmens, executors herein, to Kuehter. Kuehter is lit- ! ¡gating in this court those claims; Werner is j certainly entitled to come in and protect his ’ rights in those claims.
Motion of Temmen, etc., overruled.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.