Armstrong v. City of Cincinnati
Armstrong v. City of Cincinnati
Opinion of the Court
The object of the bill is not to enjoin opening the alley, but to -obtain a decree for compensation for alleged damages. In other words, to obtain all tho advantages of the alley and be paid into
The proceedings before the mayor to enforce the collection of" the assessment are regulated by the city ordinances. If irregular, the remedy for correcting them is at law, not in chancery. No special grounds making a’case of equitable jurisdiction is presented. Here no irregularity is complained of. The bill must be -• dismissed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.