Ohio Supreme Court, 1832

Womeldorf v. Steinbergen

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided April 15, 1832 · Admissible, Challenge, Collett, Hitchcock, Inadmissible, Were, Wright

1 Wright 41; 1 Ohio Ch. 41

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Royse v. May (Pa. 1880)
Knapp v. Hartung (Pa. 1873)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

COLLETT, J.

was of opinion that the challenge could not be received.

WRIGHT, J. was in favor of admitting it. Owing to this division of opinion, the challenge was not received, and the juror was sworn. •

A verdict was taken for the plaintiff for $227.36.

Judges HITCHCOCK and WRIGHT were of opinion the challenge was admissible. Judges COLLETT and LANE were of opinion it was inadmissible.

Owing to this division, the motion for a new trial failed, and judgment was rendered for the plaintiff on the verdict.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.