Sutton v. McCoy
Ohio Supreme Court
Sutton v. McCoy, 1 Wright 95 (Ohio 1832)
1 Ohio Ch. 95
Lane, Wright
Sutton v. McCoy
Opinion of the Court
It appears, that before the bond was executed, the clerk told the appellant he would receive the securities in it. The bond was executed in time, and handed to the clerk. He laid it away without opening till after the 30 days had expired. We think this not very material. The law requires the clerk to approve the securities, not that the bond shall be executed before him ; he did approve the security in this cause. Motion overruled.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- SUTTON v. McCOY
- Status
- Published