Ohio Supreme Court, 1832

Sutton v. McCoy

Sutton v. McCoy
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided September 15, 1832 · Lane, Wright
1 Wright 95; 1 Ohio Ch. 95

Sutton v. McCoy

Opinion of the Court

BY THE COURT.

It appears, that before the bond was executed, the clerk told the appellant he would receive the securities in it. The bond was executed in time, and handed to the clerk. He laid it away without opening till after the 30 days had expired. We think this not very material. The law requires the clerk to approve the securities, not that the bond shall be executed before him ; he did approve the security in this cause. Motion overruled.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.