Cowden v. Starr
Cowden v. Starr
1 Wright 115; 1 Ohio Ch. 115
Cowden v. Starr
Opinion of the Court
The sci. fa. does not show that the judgment of restitution was remanded by the Supreme Court to the Court of Common Pleas for execution; if it did, as the sci. fa. in this instance is used as process of execution, it would properly issue from the court having the execution of the judgment conferred upon it by law.
A sci. fa. supposes the existence of a record, and profert must be made of a record. The profert here of the boohs in the cleric's office, may or may not be of a record. The demurrer is well taken.
Leave was given to the plaintiff to amend, on pajdng costs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.