Stone v. Wilson
Stone v. Wilson
Opinion of the Court
The action of replevin is a statutory action, and is brought where goods are wrongfully detained from one entitled to the jiossession of them, who will make affidavit thereof, and that they were not taken in execution against him, nor for the payment of any tax, fine or amercement assessed against him ; 29 O. L. 128. The plea here docs not make a case within the exceptions of the statute, nor any defence to the action.
The demurrer is well taken.
160] *The parties then made up an issue in fact, and went on to 'the jury.
It appeared in evidence that one D. Yail, being possessed of a
HITCHCOCK, J. The whole case tux-ns upon the question whether Stone sold this wheat to Vail, or delivered it to him merely to be manufactux-ed. If the former, the defendant is entitled to a verdict; if the latter, the plaintiff. Verdict for the plaintiff. Damages $3.00. Judgment for that sum and costs.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- STONE v. WILSON
- Status
- Published