Richards v. Fridley

Ohio Supreme Court
Richards v. Fridley, 1 Wright 167 (Ohio 1832)
1 Ohio Ch. 167
Wright

Richards v. Fridley

Opinion of the Court

WRIGHT, J.

It is not easy to conceive a more gross and iniquitous fraud, than that this demurrer admits to have been practised by Jacob Fridley. We might, in someway, aid the object of this fraud, if we sustained the demurrer. The question of relief can be raised again after answer. We suggest the withdrawal of the demurrer, and that the complainant have leave to amend her bill, and the defendant to answer.

This was done.

Reference

Full Case Name
RICHARDS v. JACOB AND LEWIS FRIDLEY
Status
Published