Richards v. Fridley
Richards v. Fridley
1 Wright 167; 1 Ohio Ch. 167
Richards v. Fridley
Opinion of the Court
It is not easy to conceive a more gross and iniquitous fraud, than that this demurrer admits to have been practised by Jacob Fridley. We might, in someway, aid the object of this fraud, if we sustained the demurrer. The question of relief can be raised again after answer. We suggest the withdrawal of the demurrer, and that the complainant have leave to amend her bill, and the defendant to answer.
This was done.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.