Ohio Supreme Court, 1833

Lytle's Executors v. Reed

Lytle's Executors v. Reed
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided April 15, 1833
1 Wright 248; 1 Ohio Ch. 248

Lytle's Executors v. Reed

Opinion of the Court

BY THE COURT.

The only question is, can tho complainants, whose testator purchased this mortgaged property, subsequent to the mortgage, be let in to redeem, as against the defendants, who purchased at a judicial sale, under the mortgage? The case of Dennison v. * Allen, 4 O. 495, decides this precise question [249 for the defendants. Interests acquired from the mortgagor, subsequently to that of the mortgage on which the scire facias issued, and the sale was made, are concluded by the sale.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.