Ohio Supreme Court, 1833

Coleman v. Toop

Coleman v. Toop
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided June 15, 1833 · Wright
1 Wright 315; 1 Ohio Ch. 315

Counsel

Robinson for the complainant., Loofborough for the defendant.

Coleman v. Toop

Opinion of the Court

WRIGHT, J.

If there is any claim in the complainant, it is a legal claim. If either the deed or the will is valid, they are so at law, and will constitute a defence to the ejectment suit. But the case is not for hearing. The paper called a plea and demurrer, we can take no notice of; such papers are poor apologies for carelessness, and degrade the profession. The paper maybe struck off the files, and the injunction dissolved-. Continued.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.