Lowry v. Button
Lowry v. Button
1 Wright 330; 1 Ohio Ch. 330
Opinion of the Court
The boy was living with the plaintiff, and xxnder his control; he was prima facie his servant. As such, he had a right to hire him out. The person contracting with the employer, and receiving the benefits, cannot call upon the person with whom he made his contract to show the right. The court erred, and the judgment must be reversed with costs and remanded for further proceedings.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.