Ohio Supreme Court, 1834

State v. Hasleps

State v. Hasleps
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided April 15, 1834
1 Wright 500; 1 Ohio Ch. 500

State v. Hasleps

Opinion of the Court

BY THE COURT.

There seems no intention to contemn the process of the court by this witness; on the contrary, he made an effort to obey, to the extent of his ability. The attachment is to punish for disobeying the process of the court wilfully, not to redress the party injured by the absence of the witness; for that injury he has his action. The defendant is discharged, at the costs of the applicant for the writ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.