Luce v. Treasurer
Luce v. Treasurer
Opinion of the Court
There is no error in this record.
2. There were no damages to assess, the demurrer admitted the amount as found by the court of probate, but if it were not so, the court on demurrer is expressly authorized to assess damages.
3. The balance due the estate had been liquidated by the probate court, but if not, and the administrator had removed out of the jurisdiction, as is admitted here, a party may sue the bond, without 65Q] Hollowing the principal debtor into another jurisdiction : (3 O. 225.)
4. The fourth objection is of immaterial matter — there is sufficient to sustain the judgment, and we affirm it.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- LUCE AND KENTON v. THE TREASURER, &c., FOR McDONALD
- Status
- Published