Thayer v. Howard
Thayer v. Howard
Opinion of the Court
One Wilcox purchased of Hinckley, in 1821, seven acres of ground, and took his bond to make a deed, when the purchase-money should be paid. The complainant and one Hollis Abbot, who were jointly securities for Wilcox, took an assignment on the back of the title bond to indemnify them, and went jointly into possession of the land. Abbot and Thayer subsequently contracted in writing to sell an undivided half of three acres of the ground, including a distillery, to McNair, and put him into possession.
1. Plow much Abbot paid Hinckley to complete the purchase.
2. How much McNair has paid on account of his purchase to Abbot, to the complainant, and to Howard.
3. What sums have been paid by the complainant, or by Abbot, for Wilcox.
4. What Ploward paid, or agreed to pay Abbot for the land nd what, if any, condition of defeasance was entered into between them concerning it.
5. What sum, if any, Keys paid Howard for the land, and what, if any, were the conditions of the purchase.
6. What is the present value of the distillery tract and of the residue.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- THAYER v. HOWARD
- Status
- Published