Ohio Supreme Court, 1855

Satchell v. Doram

Satchell v. Doram
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided December 15, 1855 · Ranney
4 Ohio St. (N.S.) 543

Counsel

John Joliffe, for plaintiff in error., Pugh & Pendleton, for defendant in error.

Satchell v. Doram

Opinion of the Court

*Ranney, J.

It is quite unnecessary to extend this report, by assigning the reasons, at length, in support of the ruling of the court below. It is enough to say, that those rulings have been carefully examined by us, and, so far as they are in any way material in this ease, we are entirely satisfied of their general correctness.

The grounds upon which those rulings were placed, will be found fully presented in the charge of the court below.

The judgment is affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.