Spink v. Keating

Ohio Supreme Court
Spink v. Keating, 6 Ohio St. (N.S.) 206 (Ohio 1856)
Bartley

Spink v. Keating

Opinion of the Court

Bartley, C. J.

This motion is overruled. It is not deemed necessary to assign the reasons for this decision. In the case of Thompson v. Steamboat Julius D. Morton, 2 Ohio St. 26, as well as in the case of Keating v. Spink, this court held that the jurisdic*207tion of the state courts, under the water-craft law of Ohio, was •concurrent with that exercised by the federal courts. We are not disposed to depart from these well-considered decisions.

Reference

Full Case Name
Shibnah Spink v. Asa C. Keating
Status
Published