Kleinhaus v. Generous
Kleinhaus v. Generous
25 Ohio St. (N.S.) 667
Kleinhaus v. Generous
Opinion of the Court
1. Where the principal debtor has amply-indemnified the surety by mortgage, an agreement by the-creditor with the principal debtor to extend the time of credit does not discharge the surety.
2. Partners in mercantile business have power to bind the-firm by borrowing money for its use, and when money isbona fide so loaned for its use, a subsequent misapplication of the money to the individual use of the partner will not deprive the lender of his remedy against the other members-of the firm.
Motion overruled.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.