Eckel v. Renner
Eckel v. Renner
Opinion of the Court
B. effected a valid insurance upon his own life for $1000 for his own benefit, and kept it alive by due payment of premiums. Having neither wife, nor child, and becoming fond of the daughter of a friend (at the time
Meld: One who has obtained a valid insurance upon his own life, may dispose of it as he sees fit in the absence of prohibitory legislation, or contract stipulation. It is immaterial, in such case, that the assignee has no insurable interest in the life. See Clarke’s Adm’r. v. Allen, 11 Rhode Island, 439; Valton v. The Life Insurance Co., 20 N. Y., 32; St. John v. Life Ins. Co., 13 Id., 31; Ashley v. Ashley, 3 Simon’s Ch. Rep., 149.
Judgment affirmed.
Reference
- Status
- Published