Duffy v. Meyers
Duffy v. Meyers
Opinion of the Court
This cause was appealed from the court of common pleas to the district court, by which it was referred to a referee “ to hear and determine all the issues of fact in the canse/’ and report his findings and testimony.
Upon the coming in of his report, which, with the testimony, occupies several hundred pages of the printed record,
“ This day came the parties and submitted this cause to the court for decision, on consideration whereof, it appearing to the court that difficult and important questions arise and are involved in said cause, on motion of the plaintiffs thereto, none of the defendants objecting, it is ordered that said cause be and the same is hereby reserved to the supreme court for decision.” This order was entered prior to the amendment of section 455 Revised Statutes, passed April 18, 1883 (80 Ohio L. 169), expressly requiring the district court to find the facts, upon the reservation of a cause to this court.
The evident purpose of the order of reservation was to invoke the action of this court, as a preliminary question upon these motions so left undisposed of by the district court. This necessarily involved the determination of the question whether the evidence taken by the referee sustains his conclusions of fact.
The action of this court can not be thus invoked, upon issues of fact, as a court of first resort or trial court.'
Only important and difficult questions of law are authorized to be reserved for disposition here. Hubble v. Renick, 1 Ohio St. 171; Wilson v. Hamilton, 4 Ohio St. 722; Ogborn v. Taylor, 6 Ohio St. 199; unreported case of Richmond v. Richland Furnace Co., in this court, January term, 1883. Not until the issues of fact are settled below is this court empowered to entertain a case upon reservation. The cause will be remanded to the circuit court for further proceedings.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.