Harding v. Eichinger
Harding v. Eichinger
57 Ohio St. (N.S.) 371
Harding v. Eichinger
Opinion of the Court
The plaintiff below mistook his remedy. The petition' shows that Harding, and not Eichinger, was in possession of the office when the action was
Quo wa/rranto, is the proper form of remedy.
Judgment reversed, demurrer sustained, and petition dismissed-.
Reversed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.