Gee v. State
Gee v. State
60 Ohio St. (N.S.) 485
Gee v. State
Opinion of the Court
The record offered is not competent under the general rule that in a criminal proceeding the record of a civil action cannot be introduced to establish the facts on which it was rendered. The judgments offered followed verdicts which might have been lawfully returned upon a mere preponderance of evidence. A "higher degree of evidence was required to convict under the indictment and the information. Greenleaf on Evidence, section 437; Britton v. The State, 77 Ala., 202; Riker v. Hooper, 35 Vt., 457.
In the former* case the judgments of the courts below are reversed. In the latter the exception is overruled.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.