Ohio Supreme Court, 1899

Gee v. State

Gee v. State
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided June 13, 1899
60 Ohio St. (N.S.) 485

Gee v. State

Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

The record offered is not competent under the general rule that in a criminal proceeding the record of a civil action cannot be introduced to establish the facts on which it was rendered. The judgments offered followed verdicts which might have been lawfully returned upon a mere preponderance of evidence. A "higher degree of evidence was required to convict under the indictment and the information. Greenleaf on Evidence, section 437; Britton v. The State, 77 Ala., 202; Riker v. Hooper, 35 Vt., 457.

In the former* case the judgments of the courts below are reversed. In the latter the exception is overruled.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.