Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 1914

In re Floto

In re Floto
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided January 6, 1914 · Donahue, Johnson, Newman, Nichols, Shauck, Wanamaker, Wilkin
89 Ohio St. (N.S.) 446

In re Floto

Opinion of the Court

The application for a writ of habeas corpus is hereby denied *447for the reason that it appears from the petition and application for the writ that the said Charles A. Floto is not unlawfully deprived of his liberty and no constitutional right of the petitioner has been invaded.

Nichols, C. J., Shauck, Johnson, Donahue, Wanamaker, Newman and Wilkin, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑