Ohio Supreme Court, 1916

Dickerhoof v. City of Akron

Dickerhoof v. City of Akron
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided February 1, 1916 · Donai, Iue, Johnson, Jones, Matthias, Newman, Nichols, Wanamaker
93 Ohio St. (N.S.) 488

Dickerhoof v. City of Akron

Opinion of the Court

This court finds that there was no dispute between the parties as to any constitutional question arising under the constitution of this state or of the United States and no such question is presented to this court.

This court further finds that the claims and erroneous proceedings referred to by the plaintiff were waived.

Cause dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Nichols, C. J., Johnson, Donai-iue, Wanamaker, Newman, Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.