Ohio Supreme Court, 1916

Cincinnati & Columbus Traction Co. v. Burch

Cincinnati & Columbus Traction Co. v. Burch
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided January 25, 1916 · Donahue, Johnson, Newman, Wanamaker
93 Ohio St. (N.S.) 498

Cincinnati & Columbus Traction Co. v. Burch

070rehearing

On rehearing. Former judgment adhered to. See journal entry.

This court finds that the said traction company is not entitled to enforce the subscription contract sued on against the defendant in error. The record does not disclose that there are any outstanding-unpaid debts of the corporation and the rights of-creditors are not involved in this proceeding.

It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by this court that the judgment of affirmance heretofore entered herein [92 Ohio St., 540] be, and the same is, adhered to.

Johnson, Donahue, Wanamaker and Newman, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.