State ex rel. Calvert v. Hillenbrand
State ex rel. Calvert v. Hillenbrand
Opinion of the Court
This day this cause came on to be heard upon the pleadings, and agreement of counsel as to controlling facts, and was argued by. counsel and submitted to the court, and the court being fully advised in the premises, find on the issue joined for the defendants, fop the reason that under the charter provision of the city of Cincinnati, the term of office of the members of council elective at the November election, 1917, is for the term of four years commencing the first day of January next after such election; that the provision of such charter fixing the term of members of council of Cincinnati is
It is therefore considered and adjudged by the court, that a peremptory writ of mandamus prayed for by the relator be refused; that the petition of the relator be dismissed, and that the defendants go hence without day and recover from the relator their costs expended in this action.
Writ denied.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- The State, ex rel. Calvert v. Hillenbrand, etc.
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Municipal corporations — Home rule — Election and term of officers — Section 7, Article XVIII, Constitution, 1912—Charter adopted and officers chosen at same election — Members of Cincinnati council — Expiration of terms and selection of successors— Candidates’ names not to be submitted to electors, •when.