State ex rel. Schultz v. Carrel

Ohio Supreme Court
State ex rel. Schultz v. Carrel, 105 Ohio St. (N.S.) 351 (Ohio 1921)
Hough, Johnson, Jones, Marshall, Matthias, Robinson

State ex rel. Schultz v. Carrel

Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

From a consideration of the findings of the master herein appointed, this court is of opinion that there was not a sufficient number of valid signatures attached to the various petitions to authorize the referendum sought; and a writ of mandamus commanding the respondent to certify said petitions for referendum to the board of deputy state supervisors and inspectors of elections is therefore denied. *

Writ denied.

Marshall, C. J., Johnson, Hough, Robinson, Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
The State, ex rel. Schultz v. Carrel, Auditor
Status
Published